Monthly Archive:January 2017

Byddtlaw

Motor Vehicle Crash

New York

Kings County

MOTOR VEHICLE

Broadside — Motor Vehicle — Intersection — Motor Vehicle — Multiple Vehicle —Motor Vehicle — Question of Lights — Motor Vehicle — Red Light

Lawsuit: Motorist ran red light to cause crash that injured plaintiff

Verdict (P)            $40,000

Case Anthony Pierce v. Vitalii Korolyk and Alexander Oberfeld, No. 5211/14

Court     Kings Supreme

Judge     Bernard J. Graham

Date       12/6/2016

Plaintiff

Attorney(s)

                David J. DeToffol, DeToffol & Associates, New York, NY

  Read More

Byddtlaw

Auto Defects

 

An unfortunate reality for people injured or killed in a motor vehicle collision is that most drivers carry only the minimum auto insurance that their state requires. And with minimum requirements ranging from only $15,000 to $50.000 , a negligent driver likely is vastly underinsured!  When handling auto crash cases, you must be diligent and identify all potential failures that resulted in injury-an auto defect may result in more serious injuries than occurred otherwise.

The Takata air bag and GM ignition switch scandals may look like unprecedented auto safety crises, but are they? Before them, there was Toyota’s sudden acceleration defect.  The Ford/ Firestone stability and rollover defects, dangerous passive seat belt unlatching, and Ford Pinto fuel-fed fires.  And between each of these high-profile auto defect crises were countless other auto defects that caused catastrophic injury or death. Each one highlights the critical importance of carefully evaluating every motor \’Chicle crash case for a potential auto product defect.

Although some auto defects cause collisions – for example, the Toyota sudden acceleration or GM ignition switches-these claims more often involve “crashworthiness” or “enhanced injury.” Crash worthiness claims arise when a vehicle fails in a manner that causes more serious injuries than would have occurred without the defect. The common law “second collision” doctrine permits a plaintiff to recover when a manufacturer fails to design a vehicle to protect occupants in the event of a crash.  This

claim only covers enhanced injuries caused by defective design.  So the vehicle manufacturer is liable for those injuries regardless of how or why the accident happened-though some states allow defendants to compare the plaintiff’s fault in the initial crash. For example, in 2011, the Florida legislature amended state law to expressly permit juries to consider and compare the fault of all sources- even nonparties and even in the initial collision-potentially responsible for the injury:’

Read More